I've been blogging in Christian circles for about nine months now and I've noticed a trend that's got me thinking about something. As I've been reading the posts and comments of believers on many different sites I've seen a certain statement repeated over and over again. It always starts with the phrase "But, Jesus said…"
What follows is usually an exact quote from one of our various translations of what Jesus said, along with an explanation as to why what He said refutes what the blogger or person commenting on a blog has posted. What I've been thinking as a result of seeing this blog warfare tactic used repeatedly is that the person using it sometimes has the wrong idea about what Jesus said and, therefore, uses His words in an inappropriate manner, usually as a proof-text weapon. Let me explain...
I think that we sometimes believe that Jesus came to give us another, or second, law. We would likely never say it this way or agree with someone we heard saying it, but it's often how we demonstrate our understanding of His words. I confess that I can even see the point in doing so. After all, He did say, "A new commandment I give to you..."
So, what do we do? Well, we try to live everything that Jesus said to the letter, and try to convince others that they should do the same. Anything else is just being driven by emotion, a heretic, new age, or unbiblical. And again, we justify these actions and attacks with His words..."Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and acts on them, may be compared to a wise man who built his house on the rock."
Now, you're probably thinking, "And...what exactly is wrong with trying to do what Jesus said, especially since He said we should and since He is our God?" My answer to that question is that nothing is wrong with it, and that everything is wrong with it. Drop your stones, and let me elaborate. ;-)
The first thing we miss here is the timing of what Jesus said. We forget that Jesus came as a Jewish man under the law. In other words, he came under the old covenant. He lived a life that we couldn't, a life that fulfilled the law. His teachings prior to the cross often reflect this reality. However, as new covenant people, we sometimes bind ourselves to what He said while speaking as an old covenant man to old covenant people prior to the cross. We make His words our Christian law.
But, you may be thinking, "Shouldn't we? After all, He is our Lord." Well, I think the answer to this question is in the second thing we miss about what Jesus said. We miss that He spent a good portion of His earthly ministry conveying the heart behind the law (the old covenant) to those who missed the heart of it. Look at any interaction with a Pharisee and you'll see this reality.
He said things like, "You have heard that the ancients were told…but I say to you," or, "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you…," and proceeded to expose how they had missed the heart of the law while obeying the letter of it. Today we have this same concept. You'll hear folks say, "Well, he didn't disobey the letter of the law, but he certainly violated the spirit of it." We understand this concept in worldly terms, but miss it in our interactions with other believers.
So…back to what I said before…that nothing is wrong with how we handle His words, but that everything is wrong with it. We think He gave us a law, and we try to live it. We pick His words apart. We build doctrines and theologies. We examine the Greek. We take courses on hermeneutics (Who is Herman, and why do I care if he was neutered?). In the process we build mental lists of shoulds and should nots, principles to help us live the Christian life. We preach messages on "How to _______."
What is the end result? We make ourselves Christian Pharisees. Just like they knew every word of their scriptures (our Old Testament), but missed the heart of it, we know every word that Jesus said, both before and after the cross, but miss what He gave us.
And what did He give us? He always taught and preached the heart behind the law, the spirit of the law. He revealed the One who gave the law. Therefore, my conclusion is this. The new covenant promised, "I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you…I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe my ordinances…I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it." Here it is...He taught us what new covenant people look like. They are people who live from the heart, and their heart is good and imprinted with the spirit of the law. When they live from that place they are the personification of all that He said and taught.
This understanding of what He gave us is the reason we cannot dismiss what He said before the cross as simply old covenant teaching. However, it's the same reason that we shouldn't make it another law to try to live. Simply put, it is an explanation of who we are in Christ. It's an explanation of new covenant people, which brings me back to how this post began…
We sometimes beat "new heart" people over the head with a Pharisee-like understanding of what Jesus said. We go to war. All the while, the two cannot understand one another, though some of the "new heart" folks used to do the same, and, therefore, understand those who are pointing fingers at their supposed errors. Still, others have always lived from a "new heart" and simply can't understand their Christian brothers and sisters.
My advice...stop using His words as your weapons and recognize them for what they are - a description of all you can be when you're living in all that He came, died, and rose again to give you.
Read more...
John the Baptist in context
23 hours ago